counter create hit World War I and the Origin of Civil Liberties in the United States - Download Free eBook
Ads Banner
Hot Best Seller

World War I and the Origin of Civil Liberties in the United States

Availability: Ready to download

Clarifies the reasons why the first attempt to secure meaningful civil liberties occurred in the World War I era.


Compare
Ads Banner

Clarifies the reasons why the first attempt to secure meaningful civil liberties occurred in the World War I era.

32 review for World War I and the Origin of Civil Liberties in the United States

  1. 5 out of 5

    Mark

    In spite of entering the First World War pledging to make the world "safe for democracy," the administration of President Woodrow Wilson pursued the war at home with measures that dramatically restricted the rights of American citizens. Speech was curtailed, people were arrested without due process, and homes and businesses were searched without warrants, all in the name of the wartime emergency. Paul Murphy makes this campaign and the response it engendered the subject of this book, an excellen In spite of entering the First World War pledging to make the world "safe for democracy," the administration of President Woodrow Wilson pursued the war at home with measures that dramatically restricted the rights of American citizens. Speech was curtailed, people were arrested without due process, and homes and businesses were searched without warrants, all in the name of the wartime emergency. Paul Murphy makes this campaign and the response it engendered the subject of this book, an excellent short study of the war's impact on civil liberties. With America's entry into the war in April 1917, the Wilson administration secured the passage of emergency wartime measures designed to control domestic opposition to the war effort. These laws were onerous, but were presented as temporary measures necessary to achieve victory. In many ways this embodied what Murphy sees as the traditional view of civil liberties that predominated in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, which argued that only those who had "proved" that they could use their civil liberties in the right way deserved to have them protected - a view that excluded minorities, aliens, and people advocating radical ideas. That the federal government was now being employed to restrain civil liberties, Murphy argues, reflected the Progressivism of the era, as paternalistic attitudes which before the war had sought to use the federal government to address social problems now viewed it as a means of ensuring support for the war. Murphy goes on to depict the enforcement of the laws, an enforcement that was often characterized by zealousness. Though many officials used discretion in implementing the measures, others treated it as a tool for harassing groups seen as unpatriotic or unrepresentative of American values. Often private groups such as American Protective League joined in, taking it upon themselves to conduct investigations and intimidate citizens. Nor was the judiciary immune from such passions, as judges often favored prosecutors in wartime cases and instructed juries to demonstrate their patriotism by handing down guilty verdicts. Though some people were dismayed by such oppressive action and the American Union Against Militarism created a Civil Liberties Bureau (the forerunner to today's American Civil Liberties Union) in an attempt to stem these abuses, their efforts ran counter to the public climate of the time, which did not turn against the measures until after the war. With this book, Murphy has provided an excellent short overview of his topic. Written with clarity and a solid command of the legal aspects of his subject, he sheds considerable light on an often-overlooked aspect of America's past. Though some of Murphy's broader historical interpretations seem open to question and the text is peppered with mistakes (such as his continual labeling of William Gibbs McAdoo as Wilson's Secretary of State instead of Treasury), the book itself is a fine introduction to the history of civil liberties during the First World War - one with disturbing similarities to the situation that our country faces today.

  2. 4 out of 5

    Amelia Tidwell

    I must warn you: this is a very dry read. It is a presentation of facts, and while highly interesting and thorough, it is likely not something one would want read without a specific need for the subject matter. It is not an easy read either - the author uses long and complex sentence structures, and assumes the reader has at least a basic knowledge of the time period. I'd suggest this book to history students and anyone wanting a genuinely in-depth study of the effects that domestic policies dur I must warn you: this is a very dry read. It is a presentation of facts, and while highly interesting and thorough, it is likely not something one would want read without a specific need for the subject matter. It is not an easy read either - the author uses long and complex sentence structures, and assumes the reader has at least a basic knowledge of the time period. I'd suggest this book to history students and anyone wanting a genuinely in-depth study of the effects that domestic policies during WWI had on civil liberties in America. The facts are presented in such a way that the reader is bombarded with names and groups and events that can easily be confused and become overwhelming, but it is definitely thorough.

  3. 5 out of 5

    Christopher Saunders

  4. 5 out of 5

    Katina

  5. 4 out of 5

    Mary Elizabeth

  6. 4 out of 5

    Eric

  7. 5 out of 5

    Jonathan Eaker

  8. 4 out of 5

    B

  9. 4 out of 5

    Ben Crittenden

  10. 4 out of 5

    Steven

  11. 5 out of 5

    Whit

  12. 5 out of 5

    Kyle

  13. 4 out of 5

    Jon Dunning

  14. 5 out of 5

    Michael Tice

  15. 5 out of 5

    Daniel Slanger

  16. 5 out of 5

    Dakota

  17. 4 out of 5

    Daniel A.

  18. 4 out of 5

    Ryan

  19. 4 out of 5

    Kashief

  20. 4 out of 5

    Ryan Seffinger

  21. 5 out of 5

    Anne M. Lynskey

  22. 5 out of 5

    Mark

  23. 4 out of 5

    Leah

  24. 4 out of 5

    Jason

  25. 5 out of 5

    TR Peterson

  26. 5 out of 5

    Michael Davis

  27. 5 out of 5

    Sean K.

  28. 4 out of 5

    Jackson Wetzel

  29. 4 out of 5

    Jerome

  30. 5 out of 5

    Hany

  31. 4 out of 5

    Joel Trono-Doerksen

  32. 4 out of 5

    Jeremiah Bauer

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...
We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.