counter create hit Fidelity & Constraint: How the Supreme Court Has Read the American Constitution - Download Free eBook
Ads Banner
Hot Best Seller

Fidelity & Constraint: How the Supreme Court Has Read the American Constitution

Availability: Ready to download

The fundamental fact about our Constitution is that it is old -- the oldest written constitution in the world. The fundamental challenge for interpreters of the Constitution is how to read that old document over time. In Fidelity & Constraint, legal scholar Lawrence Lessig explains that one of the most basic approaches to interpreting the constitution is the process of tran The fundamental fact about our Constitution is that it is old -- the oldest written constitution in the world. The fundamental challenge for interpreters of the Constitution is how to read that old document over time. In Fidelity & Constraint, legal scholar Lawrence Lessig explains that one of the most basic approaches to interpreting the constitution is the process of translation. Indeed, some of the most significant shifts in constitutional doctrine are products of the evolution of the translation process over time. In every new era, judges understand their translations as instances of "interpretive fidelity," framed within each new temporal context. Yet, as Lessig also argues, there is a repeatedly occurring countermove that upends the process of translation. Throughout American history, there has been a second fidelity in addition to interpretive fidelity: what Lessig calls "fidelity to role." In each of the cycles of translation that he describes, the role of the judge -- the ultimate translator -- has evolved too. Old ways of interpreting the text now become illegitimate because they do not match up with the judge's perceived role. And when that conflict occurs, the practice of judges within our tradition has been to follow the guidance of a fidelity to role. Ultimately, Lessig not only shows us how important the concept of translation is to constitutional interpretation, but also exposes the institutional limits on this practice. The first work of both constitutional and foundational theory by one of America's leading legal minds, Fidelity & Constraint maps strategies that both help judges understand the fundamental conflict at the heart of interpretation whenever it arises and work around the limits it inevitably creates.


Compare
Ads Banner

The fundamental fact about our Constitution is that it is old -- the oldest written constitution in the world. The fundamental challenge for interpreters of the Constitution is how to read that old document over time. In Fidelity & Constraint, legal scholar Lawrence Lessig explains that one of the most basic approaches to interpreting the constitution is the process of tran The fundamental fact about our Constitution is that it is old -- the oldest written constitution in the world. The fundamental challenge for interpreters of the Constitution is how to read that old document over time. In Fidelity & Constraint, legal scholar Lawrence Lessig explains that one of the most basic approaches to interpreting the constitution is the process of translation. Indeed, some of the most significant shifts in constitutional doctrine are products of the evolution of the translation process over time. In every new era, judges understand their translations as instances of "interpretive fidelity," framed within each new temporal context. Yet, as Lessig also argues, there is a repeatedly occurring countermove that upends the process of translation. Throughout American history, there has been a second fidelity in addition to interpretive fidelity: what Lessig calls "fidelity to role." In each of the cycles of translation that he describes, the role of the judge -- the ultimate translator -- has evolved too. Old ways of interpreting the text now become illegitimate because they do not match up with the judge's perceived role. And when that conflict occurs, the practice of judges within our tradition has been to follow the guidance of a fidelity to role. Ultimately, Lessig not only shows us how important the concept of translation is to constitutional interpretation, but also exposes the institutional limits on this practice. The first work of both constitutional and foundational theory by one of America's leading legal minds, Fidelity & Constraint maps strategies that both help judges understand the fundamental conflict at the heart of interpretation whenever it arises and work around the limits it inevitably creates.

32 review for Fidelity & Constraint: How the Supreme Court Has Read the American Constitution

  1. 5 out of 5

    Jordan Bruce

  2. 5 out of 5

    Mr. Book

  3. 4 out of 5

    Matthew

  4. 5 out of 5

    Kimberly Hill

  5. 4 out of 5

    Liz

  6. 4 out of 5

    LPenting

  7. 5 out of 5

    Khalil Shariff

  8. 5 out of 5

    Sue

  9. 5 out of 5

    Richard

  10. 5 out of 5

    Jeremy

  11. 5 out of 5

    Thomas

  12. 4 out of 5

    Sterling Larnerd

  13. 4 out of 5

    Sarah

  14. 5 out of 5

    Dylan Jones

  15. 5 out of 5

    Erik Doucette

  16. 5 out of 5

    Vasile Rotaru

  17. 4 out of 5

    Stephen Williamson

  18. 5 out of 5

    meatbody

  19. 5 out of 5

    Victoria Heist

  20. 4 out of 5

    Mandi

  21. 5 out of 5

    Tony Defarlo

  22. 5 out of 5

    michael

  23. 5 out of 5

    Katie

  24. 5 out of 5

    Leigh Jackson

  25. 4 out of 5

    Dan

  26. 4 out of 5

    Mark

  27. 4 out of 5

    Rob Ludwig

  28. 4 out of 5

    Dakota

  29. 4 out of 5

    Logan Elias

  30. 4 out of 5

    CPL Foundation

  31. 5 out of 5

    Hudson

  32. 5 out of 5

    Harrison Recht

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...
We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.