The difference between French and German definitions of citizenship is instructive - and, for millions of immigrants from North Africa, Turkey, and Eastern Europe, decisive. Rogers Brubaker explores this difference - between the territorial basis of the French citizenry and the German emphasis on blood descent - and shows how it translates into rights and restrictions for The difference between French and German definitions of citizenship is instructive - and, for millions of immigrants from North Africa, Turkey, and Eastern Europe, decisive. Rogers Brubaker explores this difference - between the territorial basis of the French citizenry and the German emphasis on blood descent - and shows how it translates into rights and restrictions for millions of would-be French and German citizens.
Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany
The difference between French and German definitions of citizenship is instructive - and, for millions of immigrants from North Africa, Turkey, and Eastern Europe, decisive. Rogers Brubaker explores this difference - between the territorial basis of the French citizenry and the German emphasis on blood descent - and shows how it translates into rights and restrictions for The difference between French and German definitions of citizenship is instructive - and, for millions of immigrants from North Africa, Turkey, and Eastern Europe, decisive. Rogers Brubaker explores this difference - between the territorial basis of the French citizenry and the German emphasis on blood descent - and shows how it translates into rights and restrictions for millions of would-be French and German citizens.
Compare
Jonathan Madison –
The book presents a convincing argument about the intersection of nation and citizenship. But it should really be an essay as the book spends large amounts of time repeating itself
Dani –
Rogers Brubaker examines the bounds of citizenship in France and Germany. He argues that French citizenry was defined expansively, as a territorial community, while Germany citizenry was defined as a community of descent. He explains how the historic notion of citizenship - especially the differences between jus soli and jus sanguinis - affected the assimilation of second (third and fourth) generation immigrants living in the two countries during the 1980s. Citizenship and Nationhood in France a Rogers Brubaker examines the bounds of citizenship in France and Germany. He argues that French citizenry was defined expansively, as a territorial community, while Germany citizenry was defined as a community of descent. He explains how the historic notion of citizenship - especially the differences between jus soli and jus sanguinis - affected the assimilation of second (third and fourth) generation immigrants living in the two countries during the 1980s. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany presents a reasonable schematic approach to the nature of belonging to a country and, in that, it should be commended. However, the book bases most of the pre-1871 German case on looking at Prussian citizenship, and Brubaker leaves out any talk on the role of cultural nationalism.
Alex –
Good and informative book that could have been shorter.
Emmaly –
Mahlas –
Andrew –
Camille –
Danielle DeLeon –
Kerem Yıldırım –
GÜLÇİN SAĞIR KESKİN –
Dominika –
Gökçe Silman –
shivali –
Gull-Catcher –
Billy –
Fernando –
Charles Nicholas Saenz –
Nicholas –
Jonny w –
Andrew –
Darbee Hagerty –
Maxim Moshnyakov –
Cody McCall –
Jared Rothstein –
Scott –
Damla B. Aksel –
David Sivak –
Thomas James –
Sahra Işıkdemir –
Maelia –