counter create hit Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U.S. History - Download Free eBook
Hot Best Seller

Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U.S. History

Availability: Ready to download

Is civic identity in the United States really defined by liberal, democratic political principles? Or is U.S. citizenship the product of multiple traditions—not only liberalism and republicanism but also white supremacy, Anglo-Saxon supremacy, Protestant supremacy, and male supremacy? In this powerful and disturbing book, Rogers Smith traces political struggles over U.S. c Is civic identity in the United States really defined by liberal, democratic political principles? Or is U.S. citizenship the product of multiple traditions—not only liberalism and republicanism but also white supremacy, Anglo-Saxon supremacy, Protestant supremacy, and male supremacy? In this powerful and disturbing book, Rogers Smith traces political struggles over U.S. citizenship laws from the colonial period through the Progressive era and shows that throughout this time, most adults were legally denied access to full citizenship, including political rights, solely because of their race, ethnicity, or gender. Basic conflicts over these denials have driven political development and civic membership in the U.S., Smith argues. These conflicts are what truly define U.S. civic identity up to this day. Others have claimed that nativist, racist, and sexist traditions have been marginal or that they are purely products of capitalist institutions. In contrast, Smith’s pathbreaking account explains why these traditions have been central to American political and economic life. He shows that in the politics of nation building, principles of democracy and liberty have often failed to foster a sense of shared "peoplehood" and have instead led many Americans to claim that they are a "chosen people," a "master race" or superior culture, with distinctive gender roles. Smith concludes that today the United States is in a period of reaction against the egalitarian civic reforms of the last generation, with nativist, racist, and sexist beliefs regaining influence. He suggests ways that proponents of liberal democracy should alter their view of U.S. citizenship in order to combat these developments more effectively.


Compare

Is civic identity in the United States really defined by liberal, democratic political principles? Or is U.S. citizenship the product of multiple traditions—not only liberalism and republicanism but also white supremacy, Anglo-Saxon supremacy, Protestant supremacy, and male supremacy? In this powerful and disturbing book, Rogers Smith traces political struggles over U.S. c Is civic identity in the United States really defined by liberal, democratic political principles? Or is U.S. citizenship the product of multiple traditions—not only liberalism and republicanism but also white supremacy, Anglo-Saxon supremacy, Protestant supremacy, and male supremacy? In this powerful and disturbing book, Rogers Smith traces political struggles over U.S. citizenship laws from the colonial period through the Progressive era and shows that throughout this time, most adults were legally denied access to full citizenship, including political rights, solely because of their race, ethnicity, or gender. Basic conflicts over these denials have driven political development and civic membership in the U.S., Smith argues. These conflicts are what truly define U.S. civic identity up to this day. Others have claimed that nativist, racist, and sexist traditions have been marginal or that they are purely products of capitalist institutions. In contrast, Smith’s pathbreaking account explains why these traditions have been central to American political and economic life. He shows that in the politics of nation building, principles of democracy and liberty have often failed to foster a sense of shared "peoplehood" and have instead led many Americans to claim that they are a "chosen people," a "master race" or superior culture, with distinctive gender roles. Smith concludes that today the United States is in a period of reaction against the egalitarian civic reforms of the last generation, with nativist, racist, and sexist beliefs regaining influence. He suggests ways that proponents of liberal democracy should alter their view of U.S. citizenship in order to combat these developments more effectively.

30 review for Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U.S. History

  1. 5 out of 5

    Hannah

    Informative and pretty incisive. Smith's style suggests that he is quite EARNEST, a quality that many of you may know often causes me to feel...disdain. But here I think it is an asset. Informative and pretty incisive. Smith's style suggests that he is quite EARNEST, a quality that many of you may know often causes me to feel...disdain. But here I think it is an asset.

  2. 4 out of 5

    Tomato Flower

    Hard to read. Relevant today.

  3. 4 out of 5

    Cathy

  4. 4 out of 5

    Nadia

  5. 4 out of 5

    Jake Henceroth

  6. 5 out of 5

    Brian

  7. 4 out of 5

    Joshua

  8. 4 out of 5

    Jenn

  9. 5 out of 5

    Joe Soler

  10. 5 out of 5

    Paul A Corral

  11. 5 out of 5

    Rachel Nicholas

  12. 4 out of 5

    Laura Winn

  13. 5 out of 5

    Alex Cole

  14. 4 out of 5

    Thomas

  15. 5 out of 5

    Breno

  16. 4 out of 5

    Sarah

  17. 4 out of 5

    Stephen

  18. 4 out of 5

    Claire Leavitt

  19. 5 out of 5

    William Adler

  20. 5 out of 5

    Fabiola Miranda

  21. 4 out of 5

    Robb

  22. 5 out of 5

    Aurora Gray

  23. 4 out of 5

    Psbjr

  24. 4 out of 5

    Daniel

  25. 5 out of 5

    Phil

  26. 4 out of 5

    Stacey Camp

  27. 4 out of 5

    Jackie

  28. 4 out of 5

    Sebastian Sclofsky

  29. 4 out of 5

    Meridith Styer

  30. 5 out of 5

    Rakim Hd

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...
We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.